The City Sentinel

Oklahoma’s Inability to collect lnternet sales taxes costs state millions

Pam Paul Story by on November 15, 2011 . Click on author name to view all articles by this author. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


By Ron J. Jackson, Jr
Oklahoma Watch


Patti Tepper-Rasmussen doesn¹t have to wonder whether her Oklahoma City toy store is losing business to the Internet. She knows for a fact.


People will tell me in the store,” said Tepper-Rasmussen, whose Learning Tree Toys, Books and Games, Inc. has been an Oklahoma City fixture since 1985.


It’s estimated Oklahoma is losing roughly $185 million to $225 million in the last few years to online sales.
I’ll get someone who will tell me, “Well, I can get this online from such and such, and I don¹t have to pay the tax. Then I¹ll watch them walk out of the store.


Competition doesn”t bother Tepper-Rasmussen. “The lack of a level playing field does.”


Online companies aren¹t required to collect state and local taxes, she said. “We are. How can we compete with that?”


Voices like Tepper-Rasmussen might be finally gaining traction as cash-strapped states dig deeper for potential revenue streams, scouring over-antiquated tax credits and other exemptions. Internet taxation has been debated nationwide since the its inception, but as online sales have steadily increased, more Oklahomans have started to question whether remote venders should be held to the same standards as the state’s brick-and-mortar businesses.
Detractors – mostly conservatives argue the collection of Internet taxes is simply another way of saying, new tax.
Their opposition such an action as was evidenced in April when the State House defeated Senate Bill 744 ¬ a measure that extended Oklahoma¹s involvement in an interstate compact that used the Streamlined Sales and Tax Agreement model to collect taxes due from direct mail.


“The Internet sales tax issue is a cut-and-dry one,” said Rep. Mike Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City. You either violate the U.S. Constitution by collecting a tax or you don¹t.


As for those who decry the lack of fairness in competing with tax-free, online sales, Reynolds said matter-of-factly. “Whining isn’t a good reason for violating the U.S. Constitution.”


Jerry Johnson, vice chair of the State Tax Commission, is one person intimately familiar with the issue. Johnson served on an advisory committee for the University of Tennessee¹s 2009 study that estimated the amount of
e-commerce sales tax dollars lost annually by each state.


The State Tax Commission has since used the calculation model of the study, added additional data and arrived at its own estimates for Oklahoma.


Our best estimate for Oklahoma is that we’re losing between $185 and $225 million a year in state and local sales taxes,” Johnson said. The estimates represent about one third of the state¹s deficit.


Oklahoma¹s total estimate of e-commerce transactions is even more jarring. Based on the study, Oklahomans conservatively spent more than $2.9 billion over the Internet in 2007. That number is projected to swell to more than $4.5 billion by 2012.


“We’ve seen more activity on this issue in the last several months than we have in recent years,” said Johnson, referring to a newly proposed federal bill and the most recent developments surrounding Amazon.com.
In September, Amazon.com reached an historic agreement with California state officials to begin collecting and remitting sales taxes in 2012. Amazon.com also collects sales taxes in Kansas, Kentucky, New York, North Dakota and Washington.


In October, a bipartisan bill was introduced in Washington, D.C. ¬ H.R.3179, or the Marketplace Equity Act of 2011 — by U.S. Representatives Jackie Speier, D-California, and Steve Womack, R-Arkansas. The bill essentially grants states the authority to require out-of-state retailers to collect sales taxes from in-state purchasers.


Federal law presently requires a vendor to have a presence in a state before sales taxes can be collected. The legal debate has therefore raged around a remote vendor¹s nexus, or connection to any given state.


In Oklahoma, Internet taxes are thus collected and remitted on a voluntary basis. Johnson said the system in place collects around $14 million annually — a fraction of the estimated $185 to $225 million Oklahoma is losing in sales tax revenue each year.


“I think what people need to remember is this isn¹t a new tax,” Johnson said. These are taxes already owed, but have simply gone uncollected.”


Reynolds vehemently disagrees, describing the collection of an Internet sales tax as “a new sales tax. Book store owner Joanie Stephenson of Tulsa brings up another important aspect to the debate.


Internet retailers aren¹t required to collect sales taxes like we do,” said Stephenson, who owns Tulsa¹s iconic 64-year-old soda fountain, Steve¹s Sundry, Books and Magazines. “That ultimately hurts the city as a whole. As more and more people purchase items over the Internet because they don’t have to pay a sales tax, that¹s more and more money that¹s not going to our city to pay for roads and police and fire.


“I don¹t know why it’s so hard for some people to see. To me, it’s not a political issue. It¹s just good business.”
In January, Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett told President Barack Obama in a White House meeting that cities were being hurt by tax-free sales on the Internet. Cornett estimated that Oklahoma City was losing as much as $15 million annually in potential sales tax revenue to online sellers.


The $15 million would represent roughly 10.5% of the Oklahoma City Police Department¹s 2011-2012 budget.
Mostly, business owners claim its chipping away at Oklahoma¹s main streets, thus giving rise to advocacy groups such as Stand With Main Street. In some department stores, evidence of the battle can be seen in plain view with signs that warn customers not to take pictures of the merchandise.


“Cell phone technology has become so sophisticated, customers can literally take a picture of a tag on the merchandise and have the item ordered online before they ever leave your store,” Tepper-Rasmussen said.
Of course, they don¹t have to pay the sales tax. I’ve seen people take pictures with their phones, but what can you do?


One Edmond business owner claims the disadvantage of competing with tax-free retailers on the Internet might even put her jewelry and clothing store out of business. The owner has been in the same downtown district for nearly three decades.


“The Internet is killing me,” said the owner, who asked to remain anonymous. “I¹m just afraid to say anything publicly for fear of losing more customers, but I¹m not alone,” said the Oklahoma retailer.


“How are we supposed to compete with tax-free retailers online? I’ve seen it in my store. I had one customer come in and ask if I could order her a coat. So I did. When I called to tell her the coat had been ordered, she said she didn¹t want it any longer. She found the coat online and ordered it because she didn¹t have to pay any sales tax. So I was stuck with a coat.”


Oklahoma¹s Estimated Total E-Commerce Transactions
Baseline
2007 — $2.9 billion
2008 — $3.1 billion
2009 — $2.8 billion
2010 — $3.5 billion
2011 — $4.1 billion
2011 — $4.6 billion
Source: University of Tennessee¹s Bruce, Fox and Luna Study (2009).

Comments are closed

Click For Western Concepts
Log in | Designed by Gabfire themes